What ARGUMENTS does
the author make? He has a stance as whether or not we should use the N-word
as white people. His position is that white people should not use that word, it
is none or our business. Yes by answering these questions we will be analyzing.
How persuasive do you
find the argument? It is very persuasive, Tim Wise gives a lot of examples
and he is very informed with his argument. He also wrote a book and during the
video he would quote some lines from it. None of Tim’s assumptions are questionable,
he seems credible. His white friend didn’t understand why he couldn’t use that
word even though his friends (black or white) used that word. It like his analogy
with your mom, you can say whatever you want about your own mom but no one else
dares or you will be very upset. “His Jewish grandfather can make jokes about
Jews, but the local Christian church cannot”.
What is the authors STANCE?
Tim is very biased. Any argument is biased in its own way. Since Tim is
from the south, he knows the community and how they can use the N-word or
certain phrases that have a negative effect on certain communities. Tim Wise
does consider the opposing views, he talks about how some white people think
they are helping the black community by saying it. Tim acknowledged other
viewpoints but he only cited his own.
Does the publisher
bring a certain stance to the work? The book publisher(s) had to have
agreed with Tim and his stance in some way.
Do you recognize
ideas you’ve run across in other sources? We know that as white people we don’t
have the right to say the N-word.
Does this source
support or challenge your own position? We
agree with his
What can you tell
about the intended AUDIENCE and PURPOSE? The audience is mainly white people. The purpose
is to convince white people that they have no right to use that word. We are
members of the audience addressed. The main purpose is to argue a certain
point.
No comments:
Post a Comment